Case Digest (A.M. No. P-87-119)
Facts:
- Judge Thelma A. Ponferrada, Presiding Judge of Branch 18 of the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC) in Manila, filed a complaint against her Staff Assistant II, Edna Relator, on August 26, 1987.
- The complaint alleged grave misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service.
- Specific accusations included making false entries in court dockets and falsifying court orders to facilitate the withdrawal of cash bail.
- The Supreme Court referred the case to Executive Judge Abelardo Dayrit for investigation on October 19, 1987.
- On January 11, 1988, Judge Dayrit recommended Relator's dismissal from service after discovering irregularities in court orders and dockets.
- The City Auditor of Manila reported a suspicious cash bail withdrawal of P3,300.00 in favor of Dominga Quiton.
- Relator was found to have manipulated court records and forged signatures, admitting to the false entries.
- Atty. Ramon Reyes, the Branch Clerk, confirmed he had not signed the documents attributed to him.
- Relator had been absent from work since August 31, 1987, without providing a forwarding address.
- The evidence presented was sufficient to establish Relator's misconduct.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court dismissed Edna Relator from her position as Staff Assistant II at Branch 18 of the MeTC in Manila, with prejudice to her reinstatement or reemployment in any government service.
- All retirement benefits and privileges to which she may have been entitled were forfeited.
- The Court ref...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Court's decision was based on Executive Judge Dayrit's findings, which confirmed that Edna Relator engaged in serious misconduct by falsifying court records and orders.
- Evidence, including certification from the Clerk ...continue reading
Case Digest (A.M. No. P-87-119)
Facts:
In the case of Judge Thelma A. Ponferrada vs. Edna Relator, the complainant, Judge Thelma A. Ponferrada, who served as the Presiding Judge of Branch 18 of the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC) in Manila, filed an affidavit-complaint on August 26, 1987, against her Staff Assistant II, Edna Relator. The complaint alleged grave misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service. The specific accusations against Relator included making false entries in court dockets for cases not assigned to her branch and falsifying court orders to facilitate the withdrawal of cash bail.
Following the complaint, the Supreme Court referred the matter to Executive Judge Abelardo Dayrit of the Regional Trial Court of Manila for investigation on October 19, 1987. On January 11, 1988, Judge Dayrit submitted a report recommending the dismissal of Relator from service. The report highlighted that the City Auditor of Manila had informed Judge Ponferrada about the withdrawal of cash bail amounting to P3,300.00 in favor of Dominga Quiton, which raised suspicions regarding the authenticity of court orders.
Judge Ponferrada discovered that Relator had manipulated court dockets to falsely indicate that certain criminal cases were assigned to her sala, when in fact they were not. The investigation revealed that the signatures on the court orders were forged, and Relator ha...