Case Digest (G. R. No. 40770)
Facts:
- The case involves the People of the Philippine Islands as the plaintiff and appellee, and Felimon Carillo as the defendant and appellant.
- Initially heard in the Court of First Instance of Capiz.
- On October 23, 1933, the Court of First Instance rendered a decision against Felimon Carillo.
- Details of the events leading to the case are not provided in the decision summary.
- Carillo was found guilty of an offense warranting a penalty.
- Carillo appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands.
- The Supreme Court rendered its decision on August 25, 1934, after reviewing the records and submissions from both parties.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of First Instance of Capiz with a modification.
- Felimon Carillo was sentenced to pay a fine of P100.00 with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency.
- Carillo was also ordered to pay the costs in both instances, amounting to P24.00.
- The tria...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court found the original decision largely correct but adjusted the penalty.
- The modification to a fine of P100.00 with subsidiary imprisonment suggests a financial penalty was deemed more...continue reading
Case Digest (G. R. No. 40770)
Facts:
The case involves the People of the Philippine Islands as the plaintiff and appellee, and Felimon Carillo as the defendant and appellant. The case was initially heard in the Court of First Instance of Capiz. On October 23, 1933, the Court of First Instance rendered a decision against Felimon Carillo. The details of the events leading to the case are not provided in the decision summary, but it is clear that Carillo was found guilty of an offense that warranted a penalty. Carillo subsequently appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands. The Supreme Court, having acquired jurisdiction and after considering the records and submissions from both parties, rendered its decision on August 25, 1934.
Issue:
- Did the Court of First Instance of Capiz err in its decision against Felimon Carillo?
- Is the penalty imposed on Felimon Carillo appropriate and just?