Case Digest (G. R. No. 40463)
Facts:
- The case involves the People of the Philippine Islands as the plaintiff and appellee, and Timoteo Pangilinan as the defendant and appellant.
- Initially tried in the Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija.
- On August 25, 1933, the lower court rendered a decision against Timoteo Pangilinan.
- Pangilinan subsequently appealed the decision.
- The Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands reviewed the case.
- The specific charges against Pangilinan are not detailed, but it is a criminal matter where he was found guilty by the lower court.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija with a modification.
- Timoteo Pangilinan is sentenced to an indeterminate sentence ranging from a minimum of three months to a maximum of one year and one day.
- The sentence includes the accessories appropriate to arresto mayor and prision correccional.
- The costs of the proceedings, amounting to P24.00, are to be borne by the appellant....(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court found the conviction of Timoteo Pangilinan to be supported by the evidence and legal standards.
- The modification of the sentence to an indeterminate range suggests consideration of mitigating factors or reassessment of the appropriate punishment...continue reading
Case Digest (G. R. No. 40463)
Facts:
The case involves the People of the Philippine Islands as the plaintiff and appellee, and Timoteo Pangilinan as the defendant and appellant. The case was initially tried in the Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija. On August 25, 1933, the lower court rendered a decision against Timoteo Pangilinan, which he subsequently appealed. The Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands acquired jurisdiction over the case and reviewed the records and arguments submitted by both parties. The events leading to the case and the specific charges against Pangilinan are not detailed in the provided text, but it is clear that the case involves a criminal matter where Pangilinan was found guilty by the lower court.
Issue:
- Did the Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija err in its decision to convict Timoteo Pangilinan?
- Is the sentence imposed by the lower court appropriate and just?
Ruling:
The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of First Instance...