Title
Philippine Resources Development Corp. vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-20063
Decision Date
Mar 31, 1965
The Supreme Court orders Macario Apostol to return properties or pay their value to satisfy a debt owed to the Philippine Resources Development Corporation, denying his claim of immunity from suit.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-20063)

Facts:

  • The case involves Philippine Resources Development Corporation (petitioner) against the Republic of the Philippines, Macario Apostol, and Empire Insurance Company (respondents).
  • In 1951, Macario Apostol contracted with the Bureau of Prisons to purchase almaciga and 3,000,000 board feet of lauan logs for P88.00 per thousand board feet.
  • Apostol posted a performance bond of P10,000.00 with Empire Insurance Company as surety.
  • The Bureau of Prisons delivered the logs and almaciga, but Apostol failed to pay the full amount, leaving an outstanding balance of P34,015.06.
  • To settle the debt, Apostol delivered materials valued at P30,436.94, but the Bureau of Prisons did not credit this due to lack of documentation.
  • On May 6, 1955, the Republic filed a complaint against Apostol and Empire Insurance Company for the outstanding amount.
  • Apostol claimed to have settled his account in kind and admitted to a remaining balance of P758.12.
  • Empire Insurance Company filed a cross-claim against Apostol and his co-maker, Arsenio Afan.
  • The Philippine Resources Development Corporation sought to intervene, claiming ownership of the delivered materials, but the trial court denied this motion.
  • The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's decision, allowing the intervention, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court.
  • The trial court ruled in favor of the Republic, ordering Apostol to pay the outstanding amount and absolving Empire Insurance Company.
  • Both the Republic and Apostol appealed, leading to a modified decision by the Court of Appeals.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the Republic of the Philippines is immune from suit in this case, as the complaint in intervention was directed against Macario Apostol, not the Republic.
  • The dismissal of the complaint in intervention against Macario Apostol was set aside, allowing the P...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized the principle of state immunity from suit, stating that a claim cannot be maintained against the State without its consent.
  • The Court cla...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.