Title
Philippine Acetylene Co. vs. Central Bank of the Philippines
Case
G.R. No. L-17097
Decision Date
Sep 29, 1964
A company seeks a refund of taxes paid for the importation of skid tanks used in the packaging and distribution of liquefied petroleum gas, arguing that the tanks fall within the exemption provided in the tax law for accessories or equipment used in an industry.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-17097)

Facts:

  • The case involves the Philippine Acetylene Company (plaintiff-appellee) seeking the recovery of taxes paid to the Central Bank of the Philippines (defendant-appellant) for the importation of skid tanks used in the packaging and distribution of liquefied petroleum gas.
  • The skid tanks were imported by the plaintiff for transporting and storing the gas, which it bought from Caltex for sale to its customers.
  • The plaintiff requested a refund of the taxes, arguing that the tax had been collected on accessories or equipment for use in an industry.
  • The refund was denied, leading to the present action.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Manila court of first instance ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the Central Bank to return the taxes collected....(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The court determined that the plaintiff is engaged in the industry of manufacturing and selling acetylene gas, oxygen gas, and other gases.
  • While it does not manufacture liquefied petroleum gas, it imports the skid tanks for transporting and storing the gas.
  • The Central Bank argued that the plaintiff is not engaged in an industry for which the skid tanks are indispensable, as it is merely a merchant using the tanks in its business.
  • However, the court disagreed and held that the plaintiff is actually engaged in the manufacture of gases and in the packaging and distribution of liquefied petroleum gas.
  • It noted that the handling of petroleum gas through skid tanks requires technical skill and ingenuity, making it an industry rather...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.