Case Digest (G.R. No. L-279533)
Facts:
The case involves two consolidated petitions for declaratory judgment on the interpretation of collective bargaining agreements under Section 3 of Republic Act No. 875, the Industrial Peace Act.
First Case: Philippine American Management & Financing Company, Inc. (petitioner) vs. Management & Supervisors Association of the Philippine American Management & Financing Company, Inc. and several officers (respondents).
- The petitioner sought a declaratory judgment to determine if department managers could join the respondent union under the existing collective bargaining agreement.
- The lower court dismissed the petition due to lack of jurisdiction, stating that the Court of Industrial Relations (CIR) had exclusive jurisdiction.
Second Case: Philippine Virginia Tobacco Administration Employees Association-(CUGCO) (petitioner) vs. Judge Honorato B. Masakayan of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Quezon City Branch, and several individuals (respondents).
- The petitioner sought a declaratory judgment on whether a provision of the collective bargaining agreement could be implemented without the approval of the Commissioner of Civil Service.
- The lower court denied the motion to dismiss the petition, asserting its jurisdiction despite the petitioner's argument that an unfair labor practice case related to the matter was pending in the CIR.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Industrial Relations has jurisdiction over petitions for declaratory relief regarding the interpretation of collective bargaining agreements.
- The Court affirmed the order of dismissal in the first case (Philippine American Management & Financing Company, Inc. vs. Management & Supervisors Associati...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court's decision is based on the principle that labor-management relations and disputes arising from collective bargaining agreements should be primarily handled by the Court of Industrial Relations.
- The CIR is better equipped by training, experience, and background to handle s...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-279533)
Facts:
The case involves two consolidated petitions for declaratory judgment regarding the interpretation of collective bargaining agreements under Section 3 of Republic Act No. 875, known as the Industrial Peace Act. The first case is between the Philippine American Management & Financing Company, Inc. (petitioner) and the Management & Supervisors Association of the Philippine American Management & Financing Company, Inc., along with several of its officers (respondents). The petitioner sought a declaratory judgment to determine whether department managers could join the respondent union under the existing collective bargaining agreement. The lower court dismissed the petition on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, stating that the Court of Industrial Relations (CIR) had exclusive jurisdiction over such matters.
The second case involves the Philippine Virginia Tobacco Administration Employees Association-(CUGCO) (petitioner) against Judge Honorato B. Masakayan of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Quezon City Branch, and several individuals (respondents). The petitioner sought a declaratory judgment to determine whether a provision of the collective bargaining agreement could be implemented without the approval of the Commissioner of Civil Service. The...