Case Digest (G.R. No. L-35609)
Facts:
- In G.R. No. L-35609, decided on April 5, 1932, the People of the Philippines charged Daria and Lorbes with estafa for misappropriating jewels.
- Daria and Lorbes were accused of receiving jewels with the obligation to sell them and remit the proceeds to the owner.
- Instead of fulfilling this obligation, they allegedly used the jewels for their own benefit.
- The lower court found both Daria and Lorbes guilty of estafa and sentenced them.
- The case was elevated to the Supreme Court for review.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of conviction against Lorbes.
- The Supreme Court r...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court examined the evidence and found that Lorbes had misappropriated the jewels, fulfilling the elements of estafa.
- Lorbes received the jewels with the obligation to sell them and remit the proceeds but used them for his own benefit, violating the trust reposed in him.
- Insufficient evidence was found to support Daria's conviction; the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Daria participated in the misappropriation or intended to defraud the owner.
- The Supreme Court reversed Daria's conviction, em...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-35609)
Facts:
In the case of G.R. No. L-35609, decided on April 5, 1932, the People of the Philippines brought charges against two individuals, Daria and Lorbes, for the crime of estafa, specifically for the misappropriation of jewels. The case originated from an incident where Daria and Lorbes were accused of having received jewels under the obligation to sell them and remit the proceeds to the owner. However, instead of fulfilling this obligation, they allegedly misappropriated the jewels for their own use. The lower court found both Daria and Lorbes guilty of estafa and sentenced them accordingly. The case was then elevated to the Supreme Court for review.
Issue:
- Did Daria and Lorbes commit the crime of estafa by misappropriating the jewels entrusted to them?
- Should the conviction of both Daria and Lorbes by the lower court be upheld?
Ruling:
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of conviction against Lorbes but reversed the conviction as to Daria.
Ratio:
The Supreme Court, in its decision, carefull...