Case Digest (G. R. No. 41425)
Facts:
- The case is G.R. No. 41425, involving the People of the Philippine Islands as the plaintiff and Alfonso Co (also known as Quieng Sing) and Justo de Leon as the defendants.
- The events occurred in Manila, where the defendants faced criminal charges.
- The trial was conducted in the Court of First Instance of Manila, which issued a decision on March 1, 1934.
- The defendants appealed the decision to the Supreme Court for review.
- The Supreme Court reviewed the case and issued its decision on August 23, 1934, affirming the lower court's ruling.
- The Court ordered the collection of costs amounting to P24.00, to be pursued through summary proceedings.
- The case was remanded to the Court of First Instance for further action.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the order of the Court of First Instance of Manila dated March 1, 1934.
- The judgment against the defendants, Alfonso Co and Justo de Leon, was upheld.
- The Court ordered the ...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court conducted a thorough examination of the records and arguments from both parties.
- The Court found no merit in the defendants' appeal, concluding that the lower court's judgment was well-founded and supported by evidence.
- The affirmation of the low...continue reading
Case Digest (G. R. No. 41425)
Facts:
The case G.R. No. 41425 involves the People of the Philippine Islands as the plaintiff and appellee against Alfonso Co, also known as Quieng Sing, and Justo de Leon, who are the defendants and appellants. The events leading to this case transpired in Manila, where the defendants were charged with a criminal offense. The trial was held in the Court of First Instance of Manila, which rendered a decision on March 1, 1934. The defendants appealed the decision, seeking a review from the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, having acquired jurisdiction over the case, reviewed the records and the arguments presented by both parties. On August 23, 1934, the Court issued its decision affirming the lower court's ruling, thereby upholding the judgment against the defendants. The Court also ordered the collection of costs amounting to P24.00, which the trial judge was instructed to pursue through summary proceedings. The case was s...