Case Digest (G.R. No. 34223)
Facts:
- In G.R. No. 34223, decided on October 1, 1931, the People of the Philippines filed a libel case against Chen Wen and Go Puan Seng.
- The defendants were associated with a Chinese newspaper, with Chen Wen serving as the editor.
- The case stemmed from an article published in the newspaper, which allegedly contained defamatory statements.
- The lower court found the defendants guilty of libel, leading to their conviction.
- The defendants appealed, arguing the absence of malice in the publication and seeking acquittal based on reasonable doubt.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the lower court and acquitted the defendan...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court determined that the prosecution failed to establish malice in the publication of the article.
- The Court emphasized that proving malice is essential for a libel conviction.
- The evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate that the defendants acted with malicious intent.
- The presence of reasonable doubt necessitated the acquittal of the defendants.
- The principle of "innocent until proven guil...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 34223)
Facts:
In the case of G.R. No. 34223, decided on October 1, 1931, the People of the Philippines brought a libel case against Chen Wen and Go Puan Seng. The defendants were associated with a Chinese newspaper, with Chen Wen serving as the editor. The case arose from an article published in the said newspaper, which allegedly contained defamatory statements. The lower court found the defendants guilty of libel, leading to their conviction. The defendants appealed the decision, arguing that there was no malice in the publication and that they should be acquitted based on reasonable doubt.
Issue:
- Was there malice in the publication of the allegedly defamatory article by Chen Wen and Go Puan Seng?
- Sh...