Case Digest (G.R. No. 35416)
Facts:
- In G.R. No. 35416, decided on April 5, 1932, the People of the Philippines were the complainants against the respondent, Addong.
- The incident involved a breach of the peace under Article 258 of the Penal Code.
- The disturbance occurred at a place where a court was in session.
- The lower court had convicted Addong for causing a disturbance during a court session.
- Specific details of Addong's actions and the context were not elaborated upon in the brief summary.
- The lower court found sufficient grounds to convict Addong, leading to an appeal before the higher court.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The court affirmed the judgment of the lower court, sustaining the conviction of Addong for causing a disturbance...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The court's decision was based on Article 258 of the Penal Code, which addresses breaches of the peace.
- The evidence presented was sufficient to establish that Addong's actions disrupted the court proceedings, constituting a breach of th...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 35416)
Facts:
In the case of G.R. No. 35416, decided on April 5, 1932, the People of the Philippines were the complainants against the respondent, Addong. The incident in question involved a breach of the peace under Article 258 of the Penal Code. The disturbance occurred at a place where a court was in session. The lower court had previously convicted Addong for causing a disturbance during a court session. The specific details of the events leading to the disturbance, such as the exact nature of Addong's actions and the context within which they occurred, were not elaborated upon in the brief summary provided. However, it is clear that the lower court found sufficient grounds to convict Addong of the offense, leading to the appeal that brought the case before the high...