Title
People vs. Yturriaga
Case
G.R. No. L-2816
Decision Date
May 31, 1950
A municipal mayor is charged with murder after shooting and killing his political rival during a raid, but the court finds insufficient evidence of premeditation and no advantage taken of his official position, resulting in a modified sentence of eight years to 14 years and eight months.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-2816)

Facts:

  • Felipe Yturriaga, the municipal mayor of Robon, Samar, conducted a raid on a gambling house on August 3, 1947.
  • During the raid, the gamblers fled except for one individual whom Yturriaga caught.
  • As Yturriaga left the gambling house, he encountered his political rival, Jose Balite, and Balite's 12-year-old daughter.
  • Yturriaga shot and killed Balite with a pistol or revolver.
  • The Court of First Instance of Samar charged Yturriaga with murder, citing evident premeditation and abuse of his position as mayor as aggravating circumstances.
  • Yturriaga pleaded guilty but contested the aggravating circumstances and invoked mitigating circumstances of plea of guilty, drunkenness, and voluntary surrender.
  • The lower court initially sentenced him to reclusion perpetua and ordered him to indemnify Balite’s heirs with P4,000.
  • Yturriaga's counsel filed a motion for reconsideration, leading to a change in plea to not guilty and a subsequent trial.
  • The trial court found him guilty, and the case was appealed, focusing on the presence or absence of modifying circumstances.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The court ruled that the aggravating circumstance of evident premeditation was not satisfactorily established.
  • The court found that the defendant did not take advantage of his official position in committing the crime.
  • The court acknowle...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court determined that the aggravating circumstance of evident premeditation was not evident in this case.
  • The alleged threat made by Yturriaga six months prior to the killing was considered insufficient to prove premeditation.
  • The court reasoned that Yturriaga's impulsive nature and the lack of evidence showing persistence in his plan to kill Balite negated the claim of premeditation.
  • The court found no evidence that Yturriaga used his position as mayor to facilitate th...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.