Case Digest (G.R. No. L-2014)
Facts:
- Benjamin Z. Yelo, a suspended member of the Bacolod City police force, faced charges of slight physical injuries.
- The city attorney filed the information against him on March 25, 1947.
- Yelo was found guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of P25 plus costs.
- He appealed to the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental, which reviewed the case and reproduced the original information.
- On December 23, 1947, the Court of First Instance dismissed the case due to the absence of the prosecution and the complainant.
- Yelo's attorney claimed that under Article 2272 of the Revised Administrative Code, Yelo was entitled to his salary during suspension.
- The court initially agreed but later modified its order, removing the provision for back compensation after a motion for reconsideration by the city attorney.
- Yelo argued that the court lacked jurisdiction to modify the order after the case dismissal.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of First Instance's order, stating the court retained jurisdiction to modify the payment of back compensation within fifteen days of notifying the defendant.
- The judgment on back compensation was deemed within the court's discretion and did not violate the ...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court held that the Court of First Instance had the authority to revise its orders before the appeal period expired.
- Citing "United States vs. Vayson," the court emphasized that courts can correct or change judgments prior to fina...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-2014)
Facts:
The case "People vs. Yelo" involves Benjamin Z. Yelo, a suspended member of the Bacolod City police force, who faced charges of slight physical injuries. The city attorney formally filed the information against him on March 25, 1947. After a trial, Yelo was found guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of P25 along with costs. Dissatisfied with the verdict, he appealed to the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental, which reviewed the case and reproduced the information originally presented in the municipal court. On December 23, 1947, the Court of First Instance dismissed the case due to the absence of both the prosecution and the complainant. Following this dismissal, Yelo's attorney argued that according to Article 2272 of the Revised Administrative Code, Yelo was entitled to receive his salary during his suspension. Initially, the court agreed and granted this request. However, upon the city attorney's motion for reconsideration, the court modified its earlier order, removing the provision for Yelo's back compensation. Yelo contended that the court lacked jurisdiction to make this modification after the case had already been dismissed.
Issue:
- ...