Title
People vs. Villanueva
Case
G.R. No. 181829
Decision Date
Sep 1, 2010
Saturnino Villanueva was found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of three counts of qualified rape against his daughter, "AAA." The court found "AAA's" testimony credible and convincing, and there was no reason to reverse or modify the findings of the trial court on her credibility. The court also held that the medical certificate was not necessary for the conviction of rape, and the birth certificate was not necessary to establish the victim's minority. The penalty was modified to reclusion perpetua for each count, in accordance with Republic Act No. 9346. Villanueva was also ordered to pay "AAA" civil indemnity, moral damages, and exemplary damages for each count.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 181829)

Facts:

  • The case is People vs. Saturnino Villanueva, decided on September 1, 2010.
  • Villanueva was charged with three counts of qualified rape against his daughter, "AAA."
  • The incidents occurred on September 27 and 28, 1999, and June 9, 2002, in Pangasinan, Philippines.
  • "AAA" testified about enduring sexual abuse from her father since childhood.
  • At the time of the last incident, "AAA" was 12 years old.
  • Villanueva used threats and intimidation, including a bladed weapon, to perpetrate the acts.
  • He pleaded not guilty during his arraignment on November 14, 2002.
  • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found him guilty and sentenced him to death, ordering damages to "AAA."
  • The Court of Appeals (CA) later modified the sentence to reclusion perpetua due to the abolition of the death penalty under Republic Act No. 9346.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court upheld Villanueva's conviction but reclassified it from qualified rape to simple rape.
  • The Court found the prosecution's evidence, particularly "AAA's" credible testimony, sufficient for conviction.
  • It ruled that the medical and birth certificates were improperly considered since they were not formally offered in court.
  • ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court stated that a rape conviction can be based solely on the credible testimony of the victim if it is convincing and aligns with human experience.
  • "AAA's" testimony was found to be credible, detailed, and emotionally compelling.
  • The Court noted that the medical and birth certificates, although marked as exhibits, lacked legal standing due to not being formally offered. ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.