Title
People vs. Valencia
Case
G.R. No. 58426
Decision Date
Oct 31, 1984
Reynaldo and Danilo Valencia attacked Armando Salazar, leading to his death. The Supreme Court ruled it as homicide, not murder, due to lack of treachery, sentencing both to imprisonment.
Font Size:

Case Digest (G.R. No. 58426)

Facts:

Incident Overview

  • On May 14, 1978, around 4:00 PM, Reynaldo Valencia and his son Danilo Valencia went to the house of Armando Salazar in Bernales Compound, Bayan, Orani, Bataan.
  • Reynaldo carried two big stones, while Danilo was armed with a long bolo.
  • Upon arrival, Reynaldo shouted, "Putang ina mo Manding, kung tunay kang Lalake, lumabas ka," challenging Salazar to come out.

Attack on Armando Salazar

  • Salazar came out of his house, and Reynaldo threw a stone at him, which Salazar dodged.
  • Reynaldo then rushed at Salazar, held his hands behind his back, and Danilo struck Salazar multiple times with a bamboo staff and hacked him with a bolo.
  • Salazar fell to the ground, but Danilo continued to attack him, hitting him on the head and body.
  • The Valencias left the scene afterward.

Medical and Legal Proceedings

  • Salazar was taken to Orani Emergency Hospital and later transferred to the Philippine General Hospital in Manila, where he died after 16 days.
  • Dr. Prospero A. Cabayanan, a Senior Medical Officer of the National Bureau of Investigation, conducted an autopsy and determined the cause of death as "hemorrhage, meningeal traumatic."
  • Policeman Gregorio David arrived at the scene, and the Valencias voluntarily surrendered the bolo used in the attack.

Defense's Version

  • Reynaldo claimed he acted in self-defense, stating that Salazar stabbed him first, and he only hacked Salazar after being attacked.
  • Danilo denied involvement, claiming he arrived after Salazar was already on the ground.
  • The defense argued that Reynaldo's wounds were self-inflicted or inflicted by others to justify self-defense.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • (Unlock)

Ratio:

  1. Self-Defense: The burden of proving self-defense lies with the accused. Reynaldo failed to provide clear and convincing evidence to support his claim. His actions, including provoking the victim and initiating the attack, negated the claim of self-defense.
  2. Conspiracy: The Court found that both Reynaldo and Danilo acted in concert, as they arrived together armed with weapons and jointly attacked Salazar. However, the crime was classified as homicide, not murder, due to the absence of treachery.
  3. Treachery: Treachery requires that the attack be sudden and unexpected, giving the victim no opportunity to defend themselves. In this case, Salazar was aware of the impending attack after being challenged, so treachery was not present.
  4. Credibility of Witnesses: The testimonies of prosecution witnesses, including Salazar's wife and brother, were deemed credible and consistent, while the defense's version was found implausible.


Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.