Title
People vs. Ulgasan
Case
G.R. No. 131824-26
Decision Date
Jul 11, 2000
Federico Ulgasan appeals his conviction for three counts of statutory rape against an 11-year-old girl, claiming the charges were filed in retaliation, but the court rules him guilty based on the credible testimony of the victim and the lack of evidence supporting his defense.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 131824-26)

Facts:

  • Federico Ulgasan faced three counts of statutory rape against 11-year-old Noella Garolacan.
  • The assaults occurred on February 15, March 6, and April 6, 1997, in Bacolod City, Philippines.
  • Ulgasan lured Noella to a secluded area under the guise of riding his bicycle and sexually assaulted her.
  • Noella testified that Ulgasan threatened her to remain silent about the incidents.
  • Ulgasan denied the allegations, claiming they were fabricated due to a dispute with Noella's brother over a bicycle.
  • He presented an alibi, asserting he was at home during the alleged incidents.
  • The trial court found Noella's testimony credible and dismissed Ulgasan's defense.
  • Ulgasan was sentenced to reclusion perpetua for each count and ordered to pay civil indemnity and moral damages to Noella.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court upheld the Regional Trial Court's decision, finding Ulgasan guilty beyond reasonable doubt of three counts of statutory rape.
  • The Court affirmed the credibility of Noella's testimony and ruled that the lack of a police blotter entry and medical certificate did not undermine the occurrence of the crimes.
  • Ulgasan's alibi was dismissed due to the victim's positive identification.
  • He was sentenced to ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court highlighted the significance of the victim's credibility, noting that trial courts' assessments of witness credibility are typically upheld on appeal.
  • A credible witness provides a clear and consistent account, which Noella demonstrated.
  • The absence of a police blotter entry does not definitively indicate that the rapes did not occur, as su...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.