Title
People vs. Tuan y Baludda
Case
G.R. No. 176066
Decision Date
Aug 11, 2010
Estela Tuan y Baludda is sentenced to reclusion perpetua for illegal possession of marijuana, with the court affirming the validity of the search warrant and the credibility of the prosecution's evidence.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 176066)

Facts:

  • Estela Tuan y Baludda was charged with illegal possession of marijuana and a firearm.
  • The events occurred on January 24, 2000, in Barangay Gabriela Silang, Baguio City, Philippines.
  • Informants reported to SPO2 Fernando Fernandez that Tuan was selling marijuana.
  • A test buy was conducted, and a search warrant was obtained from Judge Iluminada Cabato-Cortes.
  • The search on January 25, 2000, revealed nine bricks of marijuana and a .357 caliber revolver in Tuan's residence.
  • Tuan was arraigned on April 18, 2000, and pleaded not guilty.
  • The prosecution presented four witnesses, while the defense included Tuan and her family members.
  • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) convicted Tuan on April 9, 2002, sentencing her to reclusion perpetua for marijuana possession and a prison term for firearm possession.
  • Tuan appealed, and the Court of Appeals acquitted her of the firearm charge but upheld the marijuana conviction.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Court upheld the validity of the search warrant against Estela Tuan, confirming it met constitutional requirements.
  • The Court affirmed Tuan's conviction for illegal possession of marijuana, finding sufficient proof of her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt....(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court highlighted that a search warrant's validity depends on probable cause, determined by the issuing judge through personal examination of the complainant and witnesses.
  • Judge Cortes conducted a thorough inquiry before issuing the warrant, fulfilling constitutional standards.
  • The significant quantity of marijuana found established Tuan&...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.