Case Digest (G.R. No. 30360)
Facts:
- Defendant: Faustino Sobrevilla
- Date and place: April 8, 1923, in front of the public market in Occidental Negros
- Defendant took the victim's pocket-book containing P12 from Mariano de Oca's trousers while the latter was in a crowd
- De Oca noticed the theft, struggled with the defendant, and eventually recovered his pocket-book
- Defendant was caught by a policeman shortly after
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The court ruled that the defendant's actions constituted qualified theft
- The fact that the pocket-book was recovered does not affect the defendant's liability
- The court agreed with the Att...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The court determined that the defendant's actions constituted qualified theft because he succeeded in taking the pocket-book
- The recovery of the pocket-book does not negate the fact that the defendant committed theft
- The court applied Act No. 3397, which states that a person who has been previously convicted multiple times of certain crimes and commits the same crime within ten years of their last conviction shall be considered an habitual criminal
- The information filed in the case alleged that the defendant had been previously convicted four times of theft, and the...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 30360)
Facts:
In the case of People v. Sobrevilla, the defendant, Faustino Sobrevilla, was accused of stealing a pocket-book and was convicted of qualified theft by the Court of First Instance of Occidental Negros. The incident occurred on April 8, 1923, when Sobrevilla took the pocket-book containing P12 from Mariano de Oca's trousers in front of a public market. De Oca noticed the theft and struggled with Sobrevilla, eventually recovering the pocket-book. Sobrevilla was caught by a policeman shortly after.
Issue:
The main issue raised in the case was whether the crime committed by Sobrevilla should be considered frustrated theft or qualified theft.
Ruling:
The court ruled that Sobrevilla's actions constituted qualified theft because he successfully took the pocket-book, regardless of the fact that it was later recovered by De Oca. The court also appli...