Case Digest (G.R. No. L-60055)
Facts:
- The incident occurred on July 22, 1979, in Quezon City, Philippines.
- Narciso Santos, along with several other individuals, attacked and assaulted Francisco Mappala, resulting in his death.
- The trial court found Santos guilty of murder and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The court affirms the trial court's findings, stating that it is generally reluctant to disturb the credibility findings of the trial court unless there i...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The court cites previous rulings that mere relationship to the victim does not render a witness biased, especially when there are corroborating facts.
- The court finds no convincing reasons to disregard the testimony of Resurrecion Patacsil, one of the eyewitnesses.
- The court dismisses the appellant's argument that Patacsil had an ulterior motive to testify against Santos because there is no evidence to suggest that Patacsil would falsely testify against the appellant to protect his son.
- The court explains that the appellant was not the complainant in the extortion case involving Patacsil's son, and therefore, there is no reason to believe that Patacsil would falsely testify against the appellant.
- The c...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-60055)
Facts:
The case involves Narciso Santos y Marcilang, also known as "Narsing," who was charged with murder for the death of Francisco Mappala y Carao. The incident occurred on July 22, 1979, in Quezon City, Philippines. The prosecution presented two eyewitnesses, Christopher Corpuz and Resurrecion Patacsil, who testified that Santos, along with 18 other individuals, attacked and assaulted Mappala. The witnesses stated that the attackers rained stones on Mappala's head and body, and Santos stabbed him in the chest. Mappala fought back and managed to grab the knife, stabbing one of the attackers before running away. He was later found dead at the National Orthopedic Hospital.
Issue:
The main issue raised in the case is the credibility of the eyewitnesses and whether their testimonies can be relied upon to establish Santos' guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court ...