Title
People vs. Rualo y Bellen
Case
G.R. No. 70287
Decision Date
Jul 31, 1987
In the case of People v. Rualo y Bellen, the defendant is found guilty of violating the Dangerous Drugs Act based on substantial evidence, despite his claims of being framed and denial of constitutional rights.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 70287)

Facts:

  • Feliciano Rualo was convicted by the Regional Trial Court of Manila for violating the Dangerous Drugs Act.
  • The incident took place on November 14, 1983, after authorities received a tip about illegal marijuana sales in Sampaloc, Manila.
  • Lt. Francisco M. Fausto led a buy-bust operation involving a team of five policemen.
  • Undercover Patrolman Wilfredo S. Ortega arranged to purchase P20.00 worth of marijuana from Rualo.
  • Rualo returned with two plastic tea bags containing marijuana after receiving marked bills.
  • He was arrested, and the marked bills were recovered from him.
  • Rualo claimed he was framed and denied any involvement in drug trafficking, asserting he was simply walking home.
  • He alleged that he was not informed of his rights and was coerced during his detention.
  • The trial court found him guilty based on the evidence presented.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding Rualo guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
  • The Court concluded that the trial court's assessment of the evidence was accurate.
  • Rualo...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Appellate courts typically give significant weight to the factual findings of trial courts unless there are substantial reasons to overturn them.
  • The prosecution's evidence was robust, demonstrating that Rualo accepted marked money and provided marijuana.
  • Rualo's defense of being fr...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.