Title
People vs. Romero
Case
G.R. No. 137037-38
Decision Date
Aug 5, 2002
The Supreme Court reduced Virgilio Romero's death penalty to life imprisonment due to insufficient evidence of the qualifying relationship and the victim's minority in his two counts of qualified rape.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 137037-38)

Facts:

  • Virgilio Romero was convicted of two counts of rape against his step-granddaughter, Marilou Romero.
  • The incidents occurred in April 1996 in Barangay Apad, Polangui, Albay, Philippines.
  • The Regional Trial Court of Ligao, Albay, sentenced Romero to death on December 17, 1998, under Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 7659.
  • The prosecution filed two separate informations on September 12, 1997, alleging that Romero had carnal knowledge of Marilou against her will.
  • Marilou, who was 15 years old at the time of the trial, testified that she had lived with Romero and his common-law wife, Flora, since she was one year old.
  • She reported that the first rape occurred when she was ten years old in Batangas, with subsequent incidents happening in Polangui when she was thirteen.
  • The prosecution presented witnesses, including Rodolfo Sameniano (barangay chairman) and Dr. Arnel Borja (medical examiner).
  • The defense, represented by Virgilio and Flora Romero, denied the allegations, claiming Marilou was lying due to family conflicts.
  • The trial court found Romero guilty beyond reasonable doubt, leading to an automatic review by the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the credibility of the prosecution witnesses, supporting the trial court's findings.
  • The Court determined that the rape was not qualified, as the information did not alleg...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court noted that minor inconsistencies in witness testimonies do not necessarily undermine credibility.
  • The trial judge is best positioned to assess witness demeanor and credibility; Marilou's and other witnesses' testimonies were found consistent on essential facts.
  • Delays in reporting the crime are common among young victims and do not automatically suggest fabrication.
  • For the death penalty under Article 335, the in...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.