Title
People vs. Remerata
Case
G.R. No. 147230
Decision Date
Apr 29, 2003
The Supreme Court upheld Reynaldo Remerata's conviction for selling shabu, affirming the credibility of police testimonies and the trial court's discretion on witness credibility.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 147230)

Facts:

  • The case involves the People of the Philippines (appellee) against Reynaldo Remerata y Remoquillo (appellant) and Gloria Ochoa y Remerata (at large).
  • Events occurred on April 10, 1999, in San Pedro, Laguna, following a tip about illegal shabu sales.
  • The Philippine National Police, Narcotics Command, organized a buy-bust operation based on the informant's information regarding a sale of 200 grams of shabu.
  • Police Senior Inspector Nolasco Cortez led the operation, with PO1 Aldrin Agravante as the poseur-buyer.
  • A briefcase containing a mix of genuine and fake money was prepared for the operation.
  • At around 8:30 PM, the police team arrived at the target area on San Vicente Street.
  • Agravante and the informant approached the accused, confirming the presence of money.
  • Ochoa left to retrieve the drugs and returned with two plastic bags containing shabu.
  • A commotion ensued, leading to Ochoa's escape and Reynaldo's arrest.
  • Laboratory tests confirmed the substance was methamphetamine hydrochloride.
  • An Information was filed on July 30, 1999, against both accused for violating the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1972.
  • Reynaldo pleaded not guilty, claiming he was merely buying cigarettes when apprehended.
  • The trial court found him guilty, sentencing him to reclusion perpetua and a fine of P500,000.00.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the Regional Trial Court's decision, finding Reynaldo Remerata guilty beyond reasonable doubt of violating Article III, Section 15 of Republic Act No. 6425, as amended....(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court highlighted that police officers' testimonies in buy-bust operations are generally given full faith and credit due to the presumption of regularity in their duties.
  • This presumption can only be overturned by clear and convincing evidence of improper conduct, which the appellant did not provide.
  • The Court addresse...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.