Title
People vs. Nimuan y Cacho
Case
G.R. No. 182458
Decision Date
Mar 21, 2011
The appellant's alibi was dismissed, leading to a conviction for murder supported by eyewitness testimony, resulting in reclusion perpetua and damages awarded to the victim's family.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 182458)

Facts:

  • On August 23, 2004, Rex Nimuan y Cacho was charged with murder in the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 31, Agoo, La Union.
  • The appellant pleaded not guilty during the arraignment.
  • Eyewitness Alfredo Ruiz, the victim's brother and the appellant's first cousin, testified.
  • On July 22, 2004, Alfredo saw the victim, the appellant, and Boy Nieva drinking at a local store.
  • Later, while walking home, Alfredo witnessed the appellant attack the victim with a bolo, leading to the victim's collapse.
  • Alfredo fled to seek help after observing the attack.
  • The postmortem report indicated the victim died from multiple hack wounds causing massive blood loss.
  • The appellant claimed an alibi, stating he was watching television at his uncle's house during the incident.
  • The RTC found the appellant guilty of murder on December 29, 2004, citing Alfredo's identification and postmortem findings.
  • The court recognized treachery as a qualifying circumstance but acknowledged voluntary surrender as a mitigating factor, sentencing the appellant to 20 years of reclusion temporal maximum to 40 years of reclusion perpetua and ordering P100,000 civil indemnity to the victim's heirs.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Court affirmed the conviction of the appellant for murder.
  • The Court upheld the appreciation of treachery as a qualifying circumstance.
  • The Court agreed with the Court of Appeals that the mitigating circumstance of voluntary surrender was not applicable....(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court found no reason to overturn the lower courts' findings, as the evidence established the appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Alfredo Ruiz's eyewitness account was credible and supported by the postmortem report detailing the...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.