Case Digest (G.R. No. 142511)
Facts:
The appellant, Jeanbo Muros, was found guilty by the Regional Trial Court of Romblon, Romblon, of the complex crime of forcible abduction with rape. The incident occurred on January 22, 1990, in the municipality of Romblon, where the appellant, along with three other individuals, forcibly abducted the private complainant, Regina Rocha, and raped her. Regina went to the plaza in Romblon to watch an amateur singing contest and was on her way back to her employer's house when she was waylaid by the appellant. He forcibly dragged her to a dilapidated house where two other individuals, Edgar Mazo and "Lawo," were present. Despite Regina's resistance, the appellant raped her, and the other two individuals took turns in raping her as well. Regina reported the incident to her employer, who brought her to a doctor for a physical examination. The doctor's examination confirmed that Regina had suffered hymenal lacerations and erosions. Regina then executed a sworn statement, and a criminal complaint was filed against the appellant and the other individuals involved.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
The court found the accused, Jeanbo Muros, guilty beyond reasonable doubt of rape. The court also found that the crime of forcible abduction is absorbed in the crime of rape, as the objective of the accused was to rape the victim. The accused was sentenced to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua and ordered to pay the victim P50,000.00 as moral damages, in addition to the P50,000.00 civil indemnity awa......(Unlock)
Case Digest (G.R. No. 142511)
Facts:
The case of People v. Muros involves the rape of the victim, Regina Rocha, by the accused, Jeanbo Muros, and his two companions, Egay and Lawo. The incident occurred on January 22, 1990, in Romblon, Romblon. Regina testified that she was waylaid by Jeanbo on her way home and brought to a dilapidated house where she was raped. His companions then took turns raping her. The Regional Trial Court of Romblon found Jeanbo Muros guilty of the complex crime of forcible abduction with rape and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua. The court also awarded the victim P50,000.00 as moral damages. The court based its decision on the consistent testimony of the victim and the medical findings that supported her claims. The court also noted that forcible abduction is absorbed in the crime of rape if the objective of the accused is to rape the victim.
Issue:
The main issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in finding Jeanbo Muros guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
Ruling:
The court ruled that the trial court did not err in finding Jeanbo Muros guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
Ratio:
The court found that Regina positively and categorically identified Jeanbo Muros as one of her assailants. This identification was c...