Case Digest (G.R. No. L-3396)
Facts:
- Jimmy Mosqueda faced seven counts of rape against his nine-year-old daughter, Jaymen Mosqueda.
- The incidents occurred on multiple dates: March 1991, June 1991, June 1994, October 1994, November 1994, December 1994, and May 27, 1995.
- On October 29, 1997, the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Iloilo City found him guilty.
- The trial court sentenced him to two terms of reclusion perpetua for two counts and the death penalty for five counts.
- The case was automatically reviewed by the Supreme Court due to the imposition of the death penalty.
- Jimmy appealed, arguing that the trial court wrongly dismissed his alibi and accepted the prosecution's witnesses as credible.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding Jimmy guilty of all seven counts of rape.
- The Court upheld the death penalty for five counts and confirmed two terms of reclusion perpetua for the remaining counts.
- The Court modified the trial court's award of moral damages, increasing it from P20,000 to P50,000. ...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court found Jimmy's alibi defense unconvincing, considering it the weakest form of defense against credible witness identification.
- Testimonies from the victim, Jaymen, and her sister Christine were deemed credible, consistent, and emotionally compelling.
- The delay in reporting the rapes was attributed to threats from the father, creating a climate of fear for the victim.
- The Court no...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-3396)
Facts:
In the case of People vs. Mosqueda, G.R. No. 131830-34, decided on September 3, 1999, the accused, Jimmy Mosqueda, faced charges of seven counts of rape against his daughter, Jaymen Mosqueda, who was only nine years old at the time of the first incident in March 1991. The alleged rapes occurred on various dates: March 1991, June 1991, June 1994, October 1994, November 1994, December 1994, and May 27, 1995. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Iloilo City conducted the trial, where it ultimately found Jimmy guilty on October 29, 1997. The trial court imposed two terms of reclusion perpetua for two counts and the death penalty for the remaining five counts. Due to the death penalty's imposition, the case was automatically reviewed by the Supreme Court. In his appeal, Jimmy argued that the trial court erred in dismissing his alibi defense and in accepting the testimonies of the prosecution's witnesses as credible.
Issue:
- Did the trial court err in rejecting Jimmy Mosqueda's alibi defense?
- Were the testimonies of the prosecution's witnesses credible enough to establish Jimmy's guilt beyond reasonable doubt?
- Was the imposition of the death penalty justified un...