Title
People vs. Liban
Case
G.R. No. 136247
Decision Date
Nov 22, 2000
A father repeatedly raped his 12-year-old daughter over a year, confirmed by medical evidence. Convicted, his death penalty was reduced to life imprisonment due to insufficient proof of the victim’s minority.
Font Size:

Case Digest (G.R. No. 136247)

Facts:

Background and Family Situation

  • Nerissa Liban, the private complainant, accused her father, Manuel Liban, of repeatedly raping her.
  • Nerissa and her two sisters, Leonarda and Hilda, were left in the custody of their father after their mother moved to Manila and later disappeared.
  • Manuel Liban subjected his daughters to physical abuse and sexual violence.

First Rape Incident (November 6, 1995)

  • Nerissa was 12 years old at the time.
  • Manuel arrived home drunk, demanded food, and slapped Nerissa when she set the table.
  • He forced himself on her, removed her panty, and raped her at knifepoint.
  • Nerissa cried in pain but could not resist due to fear.
  • The next morning, she left the house and stayed with her aunt for a week before her father fetched her.

Subsequent Rapes

  • Manuel continued to rape Nerissa on multiple occasions over a one-year period.
  • The last rape occurred on October 15, 1996, when Nerissa was tied and gagged.
  • Her sister Leonarda untied her after the assault, revealing that she too had been a victim of their father’s abuse.
  • Nerissa and her sisters eventually escaped and sought refuge with their maternal aunts.

Medical Examination and Complaint

  • Nerissa confided in a friend, who advised her to seek medical attention.
  • A medical certificate confirmed her non-virgin state and the presence of vaginal lacerations.
  • In December 1996, Nerissa filed a complaint against her father, leading to two counts of rape being charged.

Defense of the Accused

  • Manuel Liban denied the allegations, claiming he was at home with his youngest daughter during the alleged incidents.
  • He suggested that Nerissa was influenced by her maternal relatives, with whom he had a strained relationship.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • (Unlock)

Ratio:

  1. Proof of Rape

    • Nerissa’s testimony was credible, consistent, and supported by medical evidence.
    • No motive was shown for Nerissa to falsely accuse her father.
  2. Qualifying Circumstance of Minority

    • The death penalty for rape requires proof of the victim’s minority (under 18 years old) and the offender’s relationship to the victim.
    • The prosecution failed to present independent evidence, such as a birth certificate, to conclusively prove Nerissa’s age at the time of the rape.
    • The Court emphasized that the minority of the victim must be proven with the same certainty as the crime itself to justify the death penalty.
  3. Penalty Reduction

    • Due to the lack of sufficient proof of Nerissa’s minority, the Court reduced the penalty to reclusion perpetua, in line with jurisprudence requiring strict compliance with procedural and evidentiary rules in capital cases.
  4. Civil Liability

    • The Court sustained the awards for civil indemnity and moral damages, recognizing the trauma suffered by the victim.
    • Exemplary damages were increased to deter similar acts of sexual abuse by fathers against their daughters.


Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.