Title
People vs. Lase
Case
G.R. No. 97957
Decision Date
Mar 5, 1993
The court upholds the trial court's ruling, reinforcing witness credibility, acknowledging the trivial impact of reporting delays and minor testimonial inconsistencies, and imposing a life sentence with increased indemnity.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 97957)

Facts:

  • The case involves the People of the Philippines as the plaintiff-appellee against Alberto Lase, alias "Bert," the accused-appellant.
  • The incident occurred on May 18, 1987, in Barangay Pia-ong, Dimasalang, Masbate, where the victim, Dante Huelva, was fatally stabbed.
  • A criminal complaint for murder was filed two days later by the Acting Station Commander of the Integrated National Police (INP) of Dimasalang with the 5th Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC).
  • An inquiry by the presiding judge led to an arrest warrant for Lase, who was arrested on May 20, 1987, and later released on bail.
  • Lase did not submit a counter-affidavit during the preliminary investigation, prompting the MCTC to forward the case to the Office of the Provincial Fiscal of Masbate.
  • A reinvestigation requested by Lase resulted in the case being dismissed due to insufficient evidence, but this dismissal was reversed by the Secretary of Justice.
  • The Provincial Fiscal was directed to file an information for murder against Lase, alleging intent to kill and treachery.
  • The prosecution presented several witnesses, including Dr. Ernesto Tamayo and Godofreda Huelva, the victim's mother.
  • The defense claimed an alibi, asserting Lase was elsewhere during the stabbing.
  • The trial court found Lase guilty of murder, sentencing him to reclusion perpetua and ordering him to indemnify the victim's parents P30,000.
  • Lase appealed, claiming errors in the trial court's reliance on prosecution witnesses and the failure to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's reliance on the prosecution witnesses, affirming their credibility.
  • The Court ruled that the prosecution proved the accused-appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
  • The Court found that treachery wa...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized that the trial court is best positioned to assess witness credibility, having observed their demeanor during testimony.
  • The Court noted that the delay in reporting the crime by witness Dominico Pangantihon did not inh...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.