Title
People vs. LapiNo. y Liangao
Case
G.R. No. 122507
Decision Date
Feb 25, 1999
Romeo Lapinoso is sentenced to reclusion perpetua for rape, with the court affirming the complainant's credible testimony and the use of violence and intimidation.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 122507)

Facts:

  • The case involves the People of the Philippines as the plaintiff-appellee against Romeo Lapinoso y Liangao, the accused-appellant.
  • The Supreme Court rendered its decision on February 25, 1999.
  • The case originated from the Regional Trial Court of Iligan City, which convicted Lapinoso of rape on June 15, 1995.
  • Lapinoso was sentenced to life imprisonment and ordered to pay the victim, Maria Luna Capta, P50,000.00 as indemnity.
  • At the time of the crime, Lapinoso was 42 years old, single, and a cousin of the victim's father, living with the Capta family since 1981.
  • Maria Luna Capta was an 18-year-old third-year high school student.
  • On May 19, 1994, after a disagreement with her parents, Maria left home and sought refuge at Saint Michael Cathedral.
  • Lapinoso found her there and persuaded her to accompany him to Iligan City, promising to buy her a dress and shoes.
  • They stayed at various friends' homes, and on the night of May 21, 1994, Lapinoso allegedly threatened Maria with a knife and forced her to have sexual intercourse.
  • Despite her cries for help, Lapinoso continued the assault.
  • The following day, Maria's father discovered them, leading to a police report and Maria filing a complaint for rape on May 24, 1994.
  • The trial featured testimonies from Maria and her father, while Lapinoso denied the allegations.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding Romeo Lapinoso guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of rape.
  • The Court modified the penalty from life imprisonment to reclusion perpetua.
  • ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the complainant's credibility in rape cases, noting that the trial court is best positioned to assess witness demeanor.
  • The Court found no significant inconsistencies in Maria's testimony that would undermine her credibility.
  • It acknowledged that victims' behavior under emotional stress can be unpredictable and that trusting a relative, as Maria did with Lapinoso, is not unusual.
  • The Court addressed the appellant's argument regarding reliance on the weakness of the defense's evidence, reiterating that the prosecution's evidence must stand on its own merits.
  • Upon reviewing the record, the Court concluded that the prosecution suf...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.