Case Digest (G.R. No. L-1677)
Facts:
The case involves the defendant-appellant, Cirilo Humarang, who was charged with treason on four counts. However, the prosecution only presented evidence for two counts. The first count involved the surrender of an American named George Eddleman to a Japanese officer, Captain Nakamuri, at his residence in Cavite. The second count involved Humarang pointing out several individuals to the Japanese who were subsequently arrested during a sarzuela performance at the Biwas cockpit in Tanza. The prosecution presented witnesses who testified to these events, including Laura Muffmaster, an intelligence officer of the U.S. army, Irene de Castro, and Catalino Lubigan. The defense attempted to argue that Humarang was a guerrilla and that he had been tortured by the Japanese, but the prosecution presented evidence contradicting these claims.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
The court ruled that Humarang is guilty of treason based on the evidence presented by the prosecution. The trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment (reclusion perpetua) with the ac...(Unlock)
Ratio:
The co...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-1677)
Facts:
The case of People v. Humarang involves the defendant-appellant, Cirilo Humarang, who was charged with treason for surrendering an American, George Eddleman, to the Japanese and pointing out individuals to the enemy during World War II. The prosecution presented evidence on two counts: the surrender of Eddleman and the pointing out of individuals during an incident at the Biwas cockpit in Tanza. Witnesses testified that Humarang was seen with Eddleman at the house of Captain Nakamuri, and that he later admitted to taking Eddleman to the Japanese Military Police. In the Biwas cockpit incident, several witnesses testified that Humarang, along with the Japanese, apprehended and pointed out individuals who were subsequently arrested and never seen again.
Issue:
The main issue raised in the case is whether or not Humarang is guilty of treason for surrendering an American to the Japanese and pointing out individuals to the enemy during World War II.
Ruling:
The court found Humarang guilty o...