Title
People vs. Hinlo y Canalija
Case
G.R. No. L-48548
Decision Date
Jan 27, 1981
A man accused of stabbing two individuals in a domestic dispute argues that the prosecution witnesses' testimonies are inconsistent, but the Supreme Court finds these alleged flaws to be minor and inconsequential, affirming the man's conviction for murder and sentencing him to reclusion perpetua.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-48548)

Facts:

  • The case People vs. Bienvenido Hinlo y Canalija, G.R. No. L-48548, was decided on January 27, 1981.
  • The incident took place on May 8, 1977, in Almanza, Las Piñas, Metro Manila.
  • Bienvenido Hinlo engaged in a domestic dispute with his wife, during which he slapped her and threatened those who intervened.
  • He forcibly entered Lolita Manalili's home and attacked Hilarion Martin, who was seated and talking with Benjamin Dayuta.
  • Hinlo stabbed Martin twice in the back without provocation, resulting in fatal injuries, and also stabbed Dayuta once in the arm.
  • Martin was transported to Perpetual Help Medical Center but succumbed to his injuries shortly after arrival.
  • Hinlo fled the scene and subsequently attacked Juan Padayao in an alley.
  • He was arrested and charged with murder, leading to a conviction and a sentence of reclusion perpetua by the Court of First Instance of Rizal.
  • Hinlo appealed, arguing that the testimonies of prosecution witnesses were inconsistent and unreliable.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision, concluding that minor inconsistencies in witness testimonies did not compromise their credibility.
  • The Court determined that the failure to present additional witnesses did not constitute suppression of evidence, as their testimonies would have been cumulative.
  • The defense of alibi was found insufficient due to the positive identification of the accused by ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court noted that minor inconsistencies in witness testimonies do not inherently diminish credibility; they may suggest that witnesses were not rehearsed.
  • Key prosecution witnesses, Benjamin Dayuta and Saturnina Pe...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.