Case Digest (G.R. No. 119311)
Facts:
- The case People vs. Dianos was decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on October 7, 1998.
- The accused, Romeo Dianos, was involved in a violent incident on December 31, 1990, during a New Year’s Eve celebration in Cypress Point Village, Irisan, Baguio City.
- Dianos faced multiple charges: murder, attempted murder, and frustrated murder, linked to the deaths of Teresita Ortiz and Ricardo Pablo, and injuries to Zaldy Ortiz, Virgilio Ortiz, and Lizette Ortiz.
- The prosecution presented five separate informations, alleging Dianos used an M-16 armalite rifle during the incident, motivated by a land dispute.
- Witnesses reported Dianos was in military camouflage and threw a grenade before the shooting.
- The Regional Trial Court of Baguio City convicted Dianos on May 10, 1994, imposing various penalties and damages.
- Dianos appealed, questioning the credibility of prosecution witnesses and the evidence against him.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the Regional Trial Court's decision, finding Dianos guilty beyond reasonable doubt of murder, attempted murder, and frustrated murder.
- The Court upheld the credibility of the prosecution witnesses, dismissing Dianos’ claims regarding lack of motive and the significance of the paraffin test. ...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court emphasized that assessing witness credibility is primarily the trial court's responsibility, finding no substantial reason to doubt the prosecution witnesses' testimonies, despite their familial ties to the victims.
- Familial relationships do not inherently undermine credibility unless clear evidence of ulterior motives is present...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 119311)
Facts:
In the case of People vs. Dianos, the Supreme Court of the Philippines rendered its decision on October 7, 1998, concerning the accused, Romeo Dianos. The case originated from a violent incident that took place on December 31, 1990, in Cypress Point Village, Irisan, Baguio City, during a New Year’s Eve celebration. Dianos was charged with multiple offenses, including murder, attempted murder, and frustrated murder, arising from his actions during the confrontation that resulted in the deaths of Teresita Ortiz and Ricardo Pablo, as well as injuries to Zaldy Ortiz, Virgilio Ortiz, and Lizette Ortiz. The prosecution presented five separate informations against Dianos, detailing how he allegedly used an M-16 armalite rifle to shoot at the victims, motivated by a prior dispute over land. Witnesses testified that Dianos was dressed in military camouflage and had thrown a grenade before the shooting commenced. The Regional Trial Court of Baguio City, Branch 6, rendered its decision on May 10, 1994, convicting Dianos and imposing various penalties and damages. Dianos subsequently appealed the conviction, challenging the credibility of the prosecution witnesses and the weight of the evidence presented against him.
Issue:
- Did the trial court err in concluding that Dianos was guilty based on the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses?
- Was the evidence of l...