Title
People vs. Dela Cruz y Rivera
Case
G.R. No. 177572
Decision Date
Feb 26, 2008
The case involves the rape of a minor by her father. The court found the testimony of the victim, AAA, to be credible and reliable, as it was corroborated by the testimony of a doctor and the documentary evidence submitted by the prosecution. The court held that minor inconsistencies in AAA's testimony do not discredit her, and the failure to immediately report the rape does not indicate a fabricated charge. The court also ruled that the absence of physical injuries does not negate the commission of rape. The court found the appellant guilty of rape and reduced the penalty to reclusion perpetua due to the prosecution's failure to prove the qualifying circumstance of AAA's minority.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 177572)

Facts:

  • Juanito Dela Cruz y Rivera is the accused-appellant, and his daughter, AAA, is the victim.
  • Four separate charges of rape were filed against Dela Cruz for incidents occurring between March 1995 and July 1998.
  • The first incident happened on March 8, 1995, when AAA was 16 years old, during a family celebration where Dela Cruz, intoxicated, assaulted her.
  • AAA testified that she was raped multiple times in 1996 and 1997 by her father.
  • The last incident occurred on July 24, 1998, in a nipa hut where AAA and her siblings were sleeping.
  • AAA and her mother reported the incidents to the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) on July 30, 1998.
  • The prosecution presented AAA's testimony, supported by a medical examination by Dr. Armie Soreto-Umil.
  • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) convicted Dela Cruz of rape, sentencing him to death in two cases and reclusion perpetua in the other two.
  • The case was automatically reviewed due to the death penalty, and the Court of Appeals later modified the RTC's decision.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' decision, modifying the RTC's ruling.
  • Dela Cruz was found guilty of simple rape instead of qualified rape due to insufficient proof of AAA's minority.
  • The penalty was reduced to reclusion perpetua for the counts where the death penalty was initially imposed.
  • ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the victim's credibility in rape cases, stating that corroboration is not strictly necessary if the testimony is clear and convincing.
  • Minor inconsistencies in AAA's testimony did not undermine her credibility, as they related to non-essential details.
  • The absence of physical injuries was de...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.