Title
People vs. De Jesus
Case
G.R. No. 71942-43
Decision Date
Nov 13, 1986
A man is convicted of marijuana possession and sale based on a police officer's positive identification, despite a coerced confession being disregarded.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 71942-43)

Facts:

  • Carlito de Jesus, also known as "Carling," was convicted by the Regional Trial Court, Branch 124 in Caloocan City for violating the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1972.
  • The violations pertained to Section 4 and Section 8 of Republic Act No. 6425.
  • On January 17, 1984, de Jesus was arrested during an anti-narcotics operation in the Bisig Ng Nayon area, notorious for drug trafficking.
  • He was caught selling five sticks of marijuana cigarettes to Police Officer Jesus Nadonga, who was acting as a poseur buyer for P10.00.
  • A subsequent search revealed an additional 32 sticks of marijuana cigarettes in his possession.
  • The marijuana was confirmed to be illegal by the National Bureau of Investigation's forensic chemistry unit.
  • During the inquest, de Jesus admitted to the crime but later claimed he was coerced into signing a statement by the police, alleging police brutality.
  • He did not report any injuries or seek medical assistance regarding the alleged abuse.
  • The trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment and a fine of P30,000.00 for the sale of marijuana, and a 12-year sentence with a P12,000.00 fine for possession.
  • De Jesus appealed the convictions, citing several errors.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the trial court erred in convicting de Jesus on two separate informations, as possession of marijuana is inherently included in the offense of selling it; thus, only one charge should have been filed.
  • The Court affirmed the conviction for the sale of prohibited drugs, finding sufficient evidence to support the charge.
  • The Court disreg...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized that the legislature did not intend to impose separate penalties for possession when it is an inherent element of the sale of prohibited drugs.
  • The Court noted that the severe penalties for selling drugs already reflect the seriousness of the offense, making ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.