Title
People vs. Catipon
Case
G.R. No. L-49264-66
Decision Date
Oct 9, 1985
Rolando Catipon was found guilty of two counts of murder and one count of frustrated murder for shooting victims with raised hands, despite his alibi defense being deemed incredible, and the court modified the penalty to two reclusion perpetuas and increased indemnity to the victims' heirs.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-49264-66)

Facts:

  • On June 13, 1971, Rolando M. Catipon and Pedro Mojica were involved in a violent incident in Barrio Kasuyan, Ternate, Cavite.
  • Victorio Bucao and Guillermo Nato were killed, and Maximo Bucao was wounded.
  • The Bucao family was at home when the defendants arrived, initially asking for water.
  • Victorio was ordered to raise his hands and was shot multiple times, resulting in his death.
  • Guillermo, working on the ground floor, was also shot and killed instantly.
  • Rolando shot Maximo in the thigh, mistakenly believing him to be dead.
  • The prosecution's case relied on testimonies from surviving family members who identified Rolando as one of the assailants.
  • Rolando was arrested on January 21, 1973, and charged with two counts of murder and one count of frustrated murder.
  • He claimed an alibi, stating he was at a fiesta in Maragondon, Cavite, during the incident.
  • The trial court found him guilty and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua and an indeterminate prison term for the frustrated murder.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision.
  • Rolando M. Catipon was found guilty of two counts of murder and one count of frustrated murder.
  • The penalties were modified to impose two sentences of reclus...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's findings, emphasizing the credibility of the prosecution witnesses.
  • Witnesses provided consistent and detailed accounts, with their emotional state explaining any initial confusion about the assailants' identities.
  • The crime occurred in broad daylight, allowing for clear identification of Rolando.
  • The court rejected claims of mis...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.