Title
People vs. Cabanela
Case
G.R. No. 127657
Decision Date
Nov 24, 1998
Felipe Cabanela was convicted of raping his daughter, with the court rejecting his defenses and imposing the death penalty while modifying the damages awarded.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 127657)

Facts:

  • Felipe Cabanela was charged with raping his 14-year-old daughter, Genelyn O. Cabanela.
  • The incident occurred on April 14, 1995, in Barangay San Roque, Mercedes, Camarines Norte.
  • The Information alleged that Cabanela committed sexual intercourse with Genelyn against her will, using force and intimidation.
  • Genelyn testified that her father raped her three times, with the last incident on the date mentioned.
  • She described threats made by her father against her and her siblings if she disclosed the assaults.
  • Genelyn confided in her mother, Juanita O. Cabanela, who confirmed prior disclosures of the rapes.
  • Gerry Cabanela, Genelyn's brother, corroborated her account by witnessing the assault.
  • A medico-legal examination revealed healed hymenal lacerations, indicating sexual assault.
  • Cabanela pleaded not guilty, claiming an alibi of being out fishing during the incident.
  • The trial court found him guilty beyond reasonable doubt and sentenced him to death, ordering damages to be paid to the victim.
  • The case was automatically appealed to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed Felipe Cabanela's conviction for rape.
  • The Court held that the prosecution's evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
  • The Court ruled that ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the victim's testimony in crimes against chastity, which should not be dismissed lightly.
  • Genelyn's credibility was established through corroboration from her brother and medical evidence.
  • The trial court's assessment of Genelyn's demeanor during her testimony indicated her sincerity and trauma.
  • Cabanela's alibi was deemed weak and uncorroborated by disinterested witnesses.
  • The argument that a father of eight would not commit such a crime was rejected, as parental resp...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.