Title
People vs. Bawar y Labog
Case
G.R. No. 119957
Decision Date
Sep 23, 1996
Accused-appellant Rodolfo Bawar y Labog is acquitted of rape charges due to inconsistent and implausible testimony from the complainant, highlighting the importance of careful consideration of evidence in crimes against chastity.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 119957)

Facts:

  • Accused-appellant Rodolfo Bawar y Labog appealed his conviction for rape.
  • The case was decided on September 23, 1996, by the Third Division of the Supreme Court of the Philippines, with Justice Melo as the ponente.
  • On August 15, 1985, at around 12 o'clock midnight, accused-appellant entered the house of the mother-in-law of complainant Librada Opis-Montiano, where she was sound asleep.
  • Accused-appellant allegedly had sexual intercourse with complainant against her will.
  • Complainant did not immediately report the incident to the authorities, but filed a complaint seven days later.
  • Accused-appellant and his family left Marinduque for Cavite after the case was filed.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • Accused-appellant is acquitted on reasonable doubt.
  • The court finds that the testimony of complainant is implausible, inconsistent, and not in accordance with the ordinary course of nature and the ordinary habits of life.
  • Complainant's behavior after the alleged rape incident is inconsistent with th...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • In crimes against chastity, the testimony of the offended party should not be received with precipitate credulity.
  • The court must exercise the greatest degree of care and caution in considering and analyzing a complainant's testimony.
  • The evidence for the prosecution must stand or fall on its own merits and cannot draw s...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.