Title
People vs. Bautista y Mercado
Case
G.R. No. L-68731
Decision Date
Feb 27, 1987
Two brothers are accused of stabbing a man to death during a town fiesta, but while one is convicted of homicide, the other is acquitted due to doubts about his involvement and the absence of treachery, leading to reduced sentences and awarded damages.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-68731)

Facts:

  • The case involves People vs. Bautista y Mercado (G.R. No. L-68731).
  • A violent incident occurred on September 4, 1983, during a town fiesta in Macabebe, Pampanga.
  • Accused: Romeo Bautista y Mercado and Jose Bautista y Mercado.
  • Victim: Prospero Enriquez, Jr., who suffered multiple stab wounds.
  • Another individual, Pablo Liangco, was injured but survived.
  • An Information was filed on September 21, 1983, charging the Bautista brothers with murder, alleging treachery and premeditation.
  • The Regional Trial Court convicted both brothers on September 3, 1984, sentencing them to reclusion perpetua and ordering damages to the victim's heirs.
  • The trial court found the attack characterized by treachery and co-conspiracy.
  • The case was appealed for a review of evidence and testimonies.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's acceptance of the prosecution witnesses' testimonies, particularly regarding Romeo Bautista's involvement.
  • The Court found insufficient evidence to establish treachery, determining the act was homicide, not murder.
  • The Court ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the credibility of prosecution witnesses, noting their consistent testimonies supported by police accounts.
  • Minor inconsistencies in testimonies were deemed immaterial to the case's essential facts.
  • Treachery requires a deliberate choice to ensure the victim's inability to defend themselves; the chaotic nature of the altercation indicated impulsive action...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.