Title
People vs. Ballesteros
Case
G.R. No. 116905-908
Decision Date
Aug 6, 2002
Eduardo Ballesteros is convicted of illegal recruitment and estafa for representing himself as capable of securing employment for Filipino workers abroad without a license, and for misappropriating money obtained through false representations, causing damage to the complainants.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 116905-908)

Facts:

  • Eduardo Ballesteros was convicted of illegal recruitment in large-scale and estafa by the Regional Trial Court of Manila on July 6, 1994.
  • The illegal activities took place between May 23, 1992, and January 3, 1993.
  • Ballesteros falsely claimed he could secure employment for Filipino workers in Japan without a license from the Department of Labor.
  • Three private complainants—Arnel Viloria, Santiago Ricamonte, and Nenita Sorita—testified about being deceived into paying large sums for non-existent job placements.
  • The trial court found that Ballesteros conspired with Cecilia Legarbes Zabala and Jose Mendoza to defraud the complainants.
  • Following a "Joint Affidavit of Complaint" on May 11, 1993, Ballesteros was arrested.
  • He was sentenced to life imprisonment for illegal recruitment and received indeterminate penalties for estafa.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the Regional Trial Court's decision, finding Eduardo Ballesteros guilty beyond reasonable doubt of illegal recruitment in large-scale and three counts of estafa.
  • The Court upheld the trial court's findings on conspiracy and the credibility of the complainants' testimonies.
  • The penalties were modified: Ballesteros...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Illegal recruitment is defined under the Labor Code as any recruitment activity conducted without the necessary license or authority.
  • Ballesteros engaged in recruitment activities without the required license, committing illegal recruitment in large-scale against three or more individuals.
  • The evidence fr...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.