Title
People vs. Ballacillo
Case
G.R. No. 201106
Decision Date
Aug 3, 2016
Gerald Ballacillo's conviction for three counts of rape is upheld due to the victim's credible testimony and supportive medical evidence, despite his alibi and denial.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 201106)

Facts:

  • Gerald Ballacillo was charged with multiple counts of rape against his 15-year-old niece, AAA.
  • The incidents occurred in April 1999 in Lagangilang, Abra, Philippines.
  • The first incident happened on April 14, 1999, when Ballacillo forcibly had carnal knowledge of AAA under threat of a knife while gathering bamboo shoots.
  • Additional assaults occurred on April 27 and April 29, 1999, under similar threatening circumstances.
  • AAA delayed reporting the incidents due to fear of retaliation from Ballacillo and concern for her family's safety, particularly her father's violent temper.
  • In September 1999, AAA confided in a friend, and her mother later discovered her pregnancy, confirmed by medical examination.
  • Ballacillo denied the charges, claiming he was at a youth seminar during the alleged rapes and suggested his brother was responsible for AAA's pregnancy.
  • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found Ballacillo guilty of three counts of rape and acquitted him in one case due to lack of evidence, sentencing him to reclusion perpetua and ordering damages.
  • The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC's decision with modifications on damages, leading Ballacillo to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' decision, finding Ballacillo guilty beyond reasonable doubt of three counts of rape under the Revised Penal Code and the Anti-Rape Law of 1997.
  • The Court upheld AAA's credibility and the medical evidence supporting her claims.
  • The failure to specify the correct legal provision in the Informations did not invalidate the charges, as the facts clearly constituted the crime of rape.
  • ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized the significance of the victim's credibility in rape cases, especially involving minors.
  • AAA's testimony was found to be straightforward and consistent, supported by medical findings confirming her pregnancy aligned with the dates of the alleged rapes.
  • The Court noted that specific details of the crime's location are not essential element...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.