Title
People vs. Baderes y Mapisa
Case
G.R. No. L-38413
Decision Date
Aug 27, 1987
Defendant acquitted of rape due to insufficient credible evidence and lack of corroboration in the complainant's testimony.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-38413)

Facts:

  • The case involves the People of the Philippines (plaintiff-appellee) against Crisanto Baderes y Mapisa, also known as "Boy" (defendant-appellant).
  • The incident occurred on April 19, 1973, in Barrio Pineda, Pasig, Rizal.
  • Complainant Irene Anonuevo, 13 years old, lost her companion during a passion play and sought refuge at a family friend's house.
  • On her way, she was confronted by Baderes, who threatened her with a sharp object and took her to a house with three accomplices: Enrique Mision, Enrico Pinacate, and Romeo Yumo.
  • Inside the house, Irene was restrained, stripped, and raped by Baderes while his accomplices held her down.
  • After the assault, she was threatened against reporting the incident.
  • Irene informed her brother upon returning home, leading to a medico-legal examination at the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI).
  • The medical examination showed signs consistent with sexual intercourse but did not conclusively prove rape.
  • The lower court convicted Baderes of rape, sentencing him to reclusion perpetua and damages to the victim.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's decision, acquitting Crisanto Baderes of the crime of rape.
  • The Court determined that the prosecution did n...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court's decision focused on the credibility of the complainant's testimony, which was inconsistent and lacked credibility.
  • The complainant's account was contradicted by her own statements and defense witnesses, who presented a plausible narrative of consensual relations.
  • Medical findings indicated sexual intercourse but did not definitively support the claim of rape, as they were consistent w...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.