Title
People vs. Alon-Alon y Lizarda
Case
G.R. No. 237803
Decision Date
Nov 27, 2019
The Supreme Court acquits the accused due to procedural errors and insufficient evidence establishing an unbroken chain of custody in the drug-related charge.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 237803)

Facts:

  • The accused-appellant, Allan Alon-Alon y Lizarda, was charged with the illegal sale of dangerous drugs, specifically Methamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu), under Section 5, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165.
  • The incident occurred on August 13, 2012, in San Pedro, Laguna, Philippines.
  • A buy-bust operation was conducted by law enforcement after receiving confidential information about the accused's drug activities.
  • A police poseur-buyer purchased a heat-sealed plastic sachet containing shabu for P300.00 from the accused.
  • The buy-bust team marked the buy-bust money and the seized sachet.
  • The inventory and photography of the seized items were conducted only at the police station, with the accused and a media representative present, but without a DOJ representative or an elected public official.
  • A laboratory examination confirmed that the seized item contained shabu.
  • The accused denied the allegations, claiming he was merely conversing with a tenant when police entered his home and took him for questioning.
  • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found the accused guilty and sentenced him to life imprisonment and a fine of P500,000.
  • The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed this judgment with modifications regarding parole eligibility, leading the accused to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court granted the appeal, reversed the Court of Appeals' decision, and acquitted the accused-appellant due to the prosecution...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court highlighted that appeals in criminal cases allow for a thorough review, enabling correction of errors in lower court judgments.
  • To secure a conviction for illegal sale of dangerous drugs, the prosecution must prove the identities of the buyer and seller, the object of sale, and the delivery of the item sold along with payment.
  • The integrity of the seized drug, serving as the corpus delicti, must be established with moral certainty, requiring an unbroken chain of custody from seizure to court presentation.
  • The Court identified significant lapses in the chain of custody, noting that the inventory and photography were not conducted in the presence of all required witnesses, specifically lacking a DO...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.