Title
People vs. Albores y Taran
Case
G.R. No. 101122-23
Decision Date
Dec 9, 1992
A murder and frustrated murder case is overturned when witnesses testify to the accused's presence at a church 200 kilometers away from the crime scene, casting doubt on his guilt.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 101122-23)

Facts:

  • The case involves Luciano Albores y Taran, alias Dodong, charged with Murder and Frustrated Murder.
  • The incidents occurred on May 10, 1987, at around 4:00 a.m. in Purok 2, sitio Ipunan, barangay Romago-oc, municipality of Kibawe, province of Bukidnon.
  • Albores allegedly stabbed Eugenia Gumapac, causing her instantaneous death, and also stabbed Ellen Gumapac, causing injuries that would have been fatal without timely medical intervention.
  • The trial court found Albores guilty beyond reasonable doubt, sentencing him to Reclusion Perpetua for Murder and an indeterminate penalty of six to twelve years for Frustrated Murder.
  • Albores appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in favoring the prosecution's evidence over his alibi.
  • The defense claimed Albores was in Kanapolo, Magsaysay, Davao del Sur, approximately 200 kilometers away, at the time of the incident.
  • Defense witnesses testified seeing him at a church service on the morning of May 10, 1987.
  • Prosecution's rebuttal witness, Myrna Casinabe, testified seeing Albores cast his vote in Romago-oc on May 11, 1987, contradicting his alibi.
  • The trial court favored the testimony of Ellen Gumapac, the lone eyewitness, over the defense's alibi.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court reversed the trial court's decision and acquitted Luciano Albores y Taran based on reasonable doubt.
  • He was ordered to be immediate...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized the constitutional presumption of innocence and the need for the prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.
  • The Court noted that while alibi is generally a weak defense, it should not be dismissed if it raises reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt.
  • The trial court's reliance on Myrna Casinabe's testimony, which only contradicted the accused's whereabouts on May 11, 1987...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.