Title
People vs. Akai
Case
G.R. No. L-1513
Decision Date
Jun 24, 1949
Three appellants are found guilty of robbery with double homicide, physical injuries, and arson after opening fire on a house and stealing jewelry, cows, and burning the house, resulting in the deaths of two individuals, but their death penalty is not imposed due to lack of sufficient votes.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-1513)

Facts:

  • The case People vs. Akai was decided on June 24, 1949.
  • Appellants Akai, Anol, and Hadjirol were convicted by the Court of First Instance of Sulu.
  • The crimes included robbery with double homicide, physical injuries, and arson.
  • The incident occurred on May 12, 1946, around 9 PM in Sipanding, Siasi District, Sulu.
  • The appellants, along with six unidentified accomplices, attacked Asaali Asani's residence.
  • Family members targeted included Asaali's wife Mora Basan, their daughter Musah, and other relatives.
  • All occupants, except 12-year-old Musah, sustained injuries during the attack.
  • The attackers were armed with bolos, spears, and firearms.
  • They looted the house, stealing jewelry worth P285 and two cows valued at P200, then set the house on fire.
  • The remains of the deceased, Moro Asani and Mora Basan, were found in the ruins.
  • Asaali Asani reported the crime to Lt. Paraji Usman three days later, identifying the appellants.
  • A formal complaint could not be filed immediately due to the absence of a justice of the peace.
  • The defense claimed the appellants were aiding the victims, but this was contradicted by survivor testimonies.
  • The trial court sentenced the appellants to reclusion perpetua and ordered indemnities to the victims' heirs.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of First Instance of Sulu's decision, upholding the appellants' convictions.
  • The evidence presented was deemed sufficient to support the convictions.
  • Although the death penalty was considered, it was not imposed due to insufficient votes....(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court generally does not interfere with the trial court's assessment of witness credibility unless significant facts are overlooked.
  • The testimonies of surviving victims were found credible, especially Asaali Asani's prompt identification of the appellants.
  • The defense's challen...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.