Case Digest (G.R. No. L-4091)
Facts:
- Mariano M. Paras Sr. seeks to repurchase his homestead property after it was sold at an auction.
- The property in question is lot No. 2817 of the Peñaranda Cadastre No. 226, with an area of about seventeen hectares.
- Lazaro Leodones was the original owner of the property, acquired through Homestead Patent No. 32378.
- Lazaro mortgaged the property to the Philippine National Bank (PNB) in 1935 to secure a loan of P650.
- The bank initiated extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings under Act 3135 as amended.
- At the auction sale held on September 7, 1940, the bank was the sole bidder and bought the property for P400.
- Lazaro failed to repurchase the property within one year.
- The bank executed an affidavit of consolidation of ownership and obtained Transfer Certificate of Title No. 18876.
- On October 7, 1942, the PNB executed a deed of promise to sell the property to Mariano M. Paras Sr.
- Mariano eventually acquired the property through a deed of absolute sale on May 25, 1943.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the trial court.
- The auction sale was annulled.
- Lazaro Leodones was granted the right to redeem ...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The court based its ruling on Section 119 of the Public Land Act.
- Section 119 states that every conveyance of land acquired under the free patent or homestead provisions is subject to repurchase by the applicant, his widow, or legal heirs within a period of five years from the date of the conveyance.
- The court emphasized that the certificate of sale issued t...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-4091)
Facts:
The case of Mariano M. Paras, Sr. v. Court of Appeals involves the attempt of a homesteader, Lazaro Leodones, to repurchase his property after it was sold at auction. Lazaro was the original owner of a homestead property in Nueva Ecija, which he mortgaged to the Philippine National Bank (PNB) to secure a loan. When Lazaro failed to repay the loan, the bank initiated extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings and bought the property at auction for a significantly lower price than the mortgage indebtedness. The bank then executed a deed of consolidation of ownership and transferred the property to Mariano M. Paras, Sr. through a deed of promise to sell and later a deed of absolute sale. However, before the bank executed the deed of promise to sell, Lazaro had made an offer to repurchase the property, depositing a sum of money as a sign of good faith. Paras convinced Lazaro to withdraw the deposit, promising to reconvey the property to him at the same price he paid the bank. Despite the sale to Paras, Lazaro and his son continued to possess and enjoy the property. Paras then filed a case in the Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija to be declared the absolute owner of the property and to obtain possession from Lazaro and his son.
Issue:
The main...