Title
Pandi vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 116850
Decision Date
Apr 11, 2002
The Supreme Court nullifies Dr. Amer A. Saber’s appointment as Officer-in-Charge and validates Dr. Lampa I. Pandi’s designation and Dr. Mamasao Sani’s assignment at the Integrated Provincial Health Office-Amai Pakpak General Hospital in Lanao del Sur.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 116850)

Facts:

  • Dr. Lampa I. Pandi and Dr. Jarmila B. Macacua are the petitioners.
  • Respondents include the Court of Appeals and Dr. Amer A. Saber.
  • On August 9, 1993, Dr. Macacua issued a memorandum appointing Dr. Pandi as Officer-in-Charge of the Integrated Provincial Health Office-Amai Pakpak General Hospital (IPHO-APGH).
  • The memorandum also transferred Dr. Mamasao Sani to the DOH-ARMM Regional Office.
  • On September 15, 1993, Governor Mahid M. Mutilan appointed Dr. Saber as Officer-in-Charge of the same health office.
  • Dr. Sani filed a complaint on August 12, 1993, contesting his transfer.
  • Dr. Saber filed a quo warranto petition with the Court of Appeals on October 5, 1993.
  • The Court of Appeals issued a temporary restraining order on October 14, 1993, against Dr. Pandi.
  • Executive Order No. 133 was issued on October 29, 1993, transferring powers to the ARMM Regional Government.
  • On April 15, 1994, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Dr. Saber, declaring him the rightful Officer-in-Charge.
  • The decision was upheld on August 16, 1994, leading to a petition for review on certiorari.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court granted the petition, declaring Dr. Saber’s designation as Officer-in-Charge void.
  • The Court upheld Dr. Pandi's designation and Dr. Sani's assignment to the DOH-ARMM Regional Office.
  • The authority to appoint the provinc...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The decision was based on the interpretation of laws regarding the appointment of provincial health officers.
  • Prior to the ARMM Local Code, the National Government's Secretary of Health had the authority to appoint ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.