Case Digest (G.R. No. L-6180)
Facts:
- In 1946, Alberto Guinto received an emergency certificate to operate an auto-truck service between Lamao (Bataan) and Manila, and Tarlac (Tarlac) and Manila, valid until December 31, 1948.
- Guinto filed a petition on January 11, 1949, to convert his expired emergency certificate into a regular certificate (Case No. 46202).
- The hearing for the petition was set for August 8, 1950, and the case was submitted for decision on August 25, 1950.
- Guinto continued operations under the emergency certificate until a decision was made.
- On March 7, 1952, Pampanga Bus Company, Inc. filed a motion to cancel Guinto's emergency certificate, claiming he abandoned his service in 1951 and January 1952.
- Pampanga Bus Company did not present witnesses at the hearing for their motion.
- Guinto acknowledged service interruptions due to factors beyond his control, including supply issues and military operations against the Hukbalahaps.
- The Commission found Guinto's explanation unsatisfactory and imposed a fine of P50.
- Pampanga Bus Company later presented evidence from two witnesses, but the Commission upheld its previous orders, leading to a Supreme Court review.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the Public Service Commission's orders from April 28, 1952, and August 23, 1952, which imposed a fine on Guinto and denied Pampanga Bus Company's motion for reconsideration.
- The Court co...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court's decision was based on the evaluation of evidence from both parties.
- Pampanga Bus Company failed to provide adequate proof of Guinto's complete abandonment of service during the specified period.
- Guinto's service interruptions were at...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-6180)
Facts:
In the case of Pampanga Bus Company, Inc. vs. Alberto Guinto, G.R. No. L-6180, decided on December 29, 1954, the events began in 1946 when Alberto Guinto was granted an emergency certificate to operate an auto-truck service between Lamao (Bataan) and Manila, as well as Tarlac (Tarlac) and Manila. This emergency certificate was valid until December 31, 1948. On January 11, 1949, Guinto filed a petition to convert his expired emergency certificate into a regular certificate (Case No. 46202). The hearing for this petition was scheduled for August 8, 1950, and the case was submitted for decision on August 25, 1950. During this period, Guinto was permitted to continue his operations under the emergency certificate until a decision was reached regarding his application for conversion. However, on March 7, 1952, Pampanga Bus Company, Inc. filed a motion to cancel Guinto's emergency certificate and dismiss his application for a regular certificate, claiming that he had completely abandoned his authorized service during 1951 and into January 1952. At the hearing for the motion, Pampanga Bus Company did not present any witnesses. Guinto acknowledged that while there were interruptions in his service, they were due to factors beyond his control, such as difficulties in obtaining tires and spare parts, as well as the unstable peace and order situation caused by military operations against the Hukbalahaps in Bataan. The Commission foun...