Title
Orfila vs. Arellano
Case
A.M. No. P-06-2110, P-03-1692
Decision Date
Feb 13, 2006
A court employee slaps a colleague over a loan dispute; both face administrative charges for misconduct, falsification, and borrowing from subordinates.
Font Size:

Case Digest (A.M. No. P-06-2110, P-03-1692)

Facts:

Cristeta D. Orfila v. Estifana S. Arellano (A.M. No. P-06-2110)

  • On April 16, 2002, Cristeta D. Orfila, a Process Server, went to the office of Atty. Jesusa P. Maningas, Clerk of Court of RTC Manila, to give her suman for breakfast.
  • Estifana S. Arellano, a Human Rights Resource Management Officer II, barged into the office and demanded payment for a P10,000.00 loan Orfila had taken from her, including P2,000.00 in unpaid interest.
  • A heated argument ensued, during which Arellano allegedly slapped Orfila on the left cheek. Witnesses Glenda Homeres and Ernesto Lacaba corroborated the slapping incident.
  • Orfila sought medical attention and was diagnosed with swelling on her cheeks caused by slapping.
  • Atty. Maningas instructed Atty. Jennifer C. Buendia, Assistant Clerk of Court, to investigate the incident. Arellano admitted to being carried away during the altercation.
  • Orfila filed an administrative complaint against Arellano and a criminal complaint for slight physical injuries, slander by deed, and oral defamation.

Sps. Romulo and Estifana Arellano v. Jesusa P. Maningas, Jennifer C. Buendia, and Cristeta D. Orfila (A.M. No. P-03-1692)

  • The Arellanos filed a counter-complaint against Orfila, Atty. Maningas, and Atty. Buendia, accusing them of various offenses, including falsification of public documents, graft, and corrupt practices.
  • They alleged that Orfila falsified her birthdate in her Service Record and Personal Data Sheet to avoid compulsory retirement at age 65.
  • They also accused Atty. Maningas of borrowing money from Arellano and failing to pay, and Atty. Buendia of conspiring with Orfila and Atty. Maningas to harass Arellano.
  • Orfila denied the charges, claiming she had always believed her birthdate to be October 8, 1942, and that her birth records were destroyed during the Japanese occupation.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • (Unlock)

Ratio:

  1. Misconduct and Usury: Arellano's actions of slapping Orfila and lending money at usurious rates violated the Civil Service Law and the standards of conduct expected of court employees.
  2. Falsification of Documents: Orfila's falsification of her birthdate in official documents to avoid compulsory retirement constituted a grave offense under the Civil Service Law, warranting the forfeiture of her retirement benefits.
  3. Borrowing from Subordinates: Atty. Maningas's act of borrowing money from a subordinate was a light offense under the Civil Service Law, meriting a fine.
  4. Insufficient Evidence: The charges against Atty. Buendia and the additional charges against Atty. Maningas and Orfila were dismissed due to lack of substantial evidence.


Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.