Title
Olympic Mines and Development Corp. vs. Platinum Group Metals Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 178188
Decision Date
Aug 14, 2009
A mining dispute between Olympic Mines and Platinum Group Metals Corp. is brought before the Regional Trial Court, which rules in favor of Olympic and determines that the Panel of Arbitrators does not have jurisdiction over contractual disputes.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 178188)

Facts:

  • Olympic was granted "Mining Lease Contracts" by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) in 1971 and 1980.
  • In 2003, Olympic entered into an Operating Agreement with Platinum, giving Platinum exclusive rights to control, manage, and operate mining operations in certain areas for 25 years.
  • Olympic attempted to terminate the Operating Agreement in 2006, alleging gross violations by Platinum.
  • Olympic sent a termination letter, filed a complaint for injunction, and initiated administrative cases against Platinum.
  • Olympic transferred its mining rights to Citinickel without Platinum's knowledge or consent.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The RTC of Palawan has jurisdiction over the case.
  • The POA does not have jurisdiction over contractual disputes.
  • Citinickel is...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The main issue to be resolved, the validity of Olympic's termination of the Operating Agreement, is a judicial question and not a mining dispute.
  • The POA's jurisdiction under Section 77 of the Mining Act of 1995 only applies to disputes involving rights to mining areas or mineral agreements, and not to contractual dispu...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.