Title
Nicolas vs. Reparations Commission
Case
G.R. No. L-28649
Decision Date
May 21, 1975
The Supreme Court sets aside the dismissal of a breach of contract case, ruling that the stipulation on venue should be interpreted permissively and not restrict the parties to filing their suits only in Manila.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-28649)

Facts:

  • Francisco J. Nicolas, a resident of Makati, Rizal, filed an action for breach of contract against the Reparations Commission and Pedro Pastoral, both of Quezon City.
  • The case was filed in the Court of First Instance of Rizal.
  • The defendants filed separate motions to dismiss on the ground of improper venue.
  • The defendants cited a stipulation in the contract that stated "all legal actions arising out of this contract . . . may be brought in and submitted to the jurisdiction of the proper courts in the City of Manila."
  • The lower court granted the motion to dismiss, stating that the stipulation on venue was intended to be compulsory for the benefit of the Reparations Commission.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal of the case and remanded it to the lower c...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Agreements between the parties on the venue of an action should be construed reasonably and should not be applied in a way that inconveniences the parties without promoting the ends of justice.
  • The stipulation in the contract did not clearly show that the intention of the parties was to limit the venue of the action to the City of Manila only.
  • Confining the situs of the action to Manila would not serve the interests of justice, considering that all the parties and the acts sought to be restrained o...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.