Case Digest (G.R. No. L-28649)
Facts:
- Francisco J. Nicolas, a resident of Makati, Rizal, filed an action for breach of contract against the Reparations Commission and Pedro Pastoral, both of Quezon City.
- The case was filed in the Court of First Instance of Rizal.
- The defendants filed separate motions to dismiss on the ground of improper venue.
- The defendants cited a stipulation in the contract that stated "all legal actions arising out of this contract . . . may be brought in and submitted to the jurisdiction of the proper courts in the City of Manila."
- The lower court granted the motion to dismiss, stating that the stipulation on venue was intended to be compulsory for the benefit of the Reparations Commission.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal of the case and remanded it to the lower c...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- Agreements between the parties on the venue of an action should be construed reasonably and should not be applied in a way that inconveniences the parties without promoting the ends of justice.
- The stipulation in the contract did not clearly show that the intention of the parties was to limit the venue of the action to the City of Manila only.
- Confining the situs of the action to Manila would not serve the interests of justice, considering that all the parties and the acts sought to be restrained o...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-28649)
Facts:
The case of Nicolas v. Reparations Commission involves a breach of contract action filed by Francisco J. Nicolas against the Reparations Commission and Pedro Pastoral. Nicolas, a resident of Makati, Rizal, filed the action in the Court of First Instance of Rizal. The defendants filed separate motions to dismiss on the ground of improper venue, citing a stipulation in the contract that all legal actions arising from the contract may be brought in the courts of Manila. The lower court granted the motion to dismiss, ruling that the stipulation on venue was intended to be compulsory for the benefit of the Reparations Commission. Nicolas filed a motion for reconsideration, which was denied by the lower court.
Issue:
The main issue raised in the case is whether the stipulation in the contract that all legal actions arising from the contract may be brought in the courts of Manila is compulsory or permissive.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court ruled that the stipulation on venue in the contract is pe...