Facts:

• A complaint was filed by Executive Judge David C. Naval and DSWD Secretary Corazon Alma De Leon against several judges, including Judge Jose R. Panday, Judge Simon D. Encinas, and Judge Rica H. Lacson.
• The allegations against Judge Panday included immorality and obstruction of justice, specifically for having sexual relations with a minor, Cecile Buenafe, who was fifteen years old at the time of the incident on July 24, 1994.
• An investigation led to a decision on July 21, 1997, finding Judge Panday administratively liable, resulting in his dismissal from service with forfeiture of benefits.
• Judge Lacson was fined for engaging in notarial services unrelated to her official duties, while Judge Encinas faced penalties for improper conduct.
• Judge Panday filed a motion for reconsideration on August 15, 1997, seeking to overturn the charges and be reinstated, while Judge Encinas requested a lesser penalty.
• The court ultimately denied Judge Panday's motion for reconsideration on December 21, 1999.

Issue:

• (Unlock)

Ruling:

• The court found Judge Jose R. Panday administratively liable for immorality and obstruction of justice, affirming his dismissal from service.
• The testimonies presented by Judge Panday and his witnesses were deemed insufficient to disprove the allegations against hi...(Unlock)

Ratio:

• The court's ruling was based on substantial evidence against Judge Panday, particularly the credible testimony of the complainant, Cecile Buenafe, which outweighed the defense witnesses' testimonies.
• The court emphasized the importance of witness credibility, noting that a single credible witness can establish a case.
• The testimonies of Judge Panday's witnesses were found unconvincing and failed to provide a solid alibi.
• The nature of the allegations...continue reading