Title
National Shipyards and Steel Corp. vs. Court of Industrial Relations
Case
G.R. No. L-17874
Decision Date
Aug 31, 1963
In the case of National Shipyards & Steel Corp. v. Court of Industrial Relations, the Supreme Court ruled that the funds from the issuance of government bonds were not exempt from attachment and execution, and affirmed the Court of Industrial Relations' decision to garnish the funds for the payment of additional compensation to laborers.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-17874)

Facts:

  • The case involves National Shipyards & Steel Corporation v. Court of Industrial Relations (G.R. No. L-17874).
  • A petition was filed on April 15, 1957, by 39 laborers against NASSCO, a government-owned corporation.
  • The laborers sought additional compensation for night shifts, Sundays, and legal holidays.
  • An additional 29 workers submitted a supplemental petition.
  • On November 27, 1957, the Court of Industrial Relations (CIR) ruled in favor of the laborers, ordering NASSCO to pay an extra 25% of their regular compensation.
  • NASSCO's motion for reconsideration was denied.
  • A chief examiner computed the total amount owed to 41 laborers at P37,867.21.
  • The CIR approved this report and issued a writ of execution on March 8, 1958.
  • The Sheriff of Manila garnished funds from NASSCO's accounts, leading to payments to the laborers.
  • NASSCO contested the garnishment, claiming the funds were public funds exempt from attachment under Republic Act No. 1000.
  • The CIR initially upheld the garnishment but later reversed its decision, ordering the return of the funds.
  • NASSCO then filed a certiorari appeal to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that funds from government bonds are not exempt from attachment and execution.
  • The Court affirmed the CIR's decision to garnish the funds for laborers' additional compensation, conclud...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court interpreted Republic Act No. 1000, which exempts bonds issued under the Act from "taxation," "attachment," "execution," or "seizure," but not the proceeds from bond sales.
  • The principle of statutory construction, partic...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.